Welcome!

I know you have many choices to support your view of reality; thanks for choosing shut-it-down. (See my first post for the etymology.)

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

KySpace

NASA's Phoenix Mars lander has landed on the north polar region of Mars and transmitted photos.
Kentucky has its own space program, albeit on a scale smaller than NASA, but nevertheless a leader in developing "CubeSat" technology. The annual KySat (to be renamed KySpace) conference was held 07 May in Lexington. The keynote speaker was Jeffrey Manber; here is KySpace blogger Wayne Hall's post on the Manber talk; here's his full coverage of the Kentucky Space Conference '08.

Distractibility not necessarily a disability

Being easily distracted, or, as I now prefer to think of it, having a "broad attention span" may be tied to creativity and wisdom. A New York Times article reports on studies analyzed in a new edition of a neurology book, “Progress in Brain Research.”
In a 2003 study at Harvard, Dr. Carson [Shelley H. Carson, a psychology researcher at Harvard whose work was cited in the book] and other researchers tested students’ ability to tune out irrelevant information when exposed to a barrage of stimuli. The more creative the students were thought to be, determined by a questionnaire on past achievements, the more trouble they had ignoring the unwanted data. A reduced ability to filter and set priorities, the scientists concluded, could contribute to original thinking.
I cannot comment on my degree of original thinking, but others have certainly noted in me (both personally and professionally) "a reduced ability to filter and set priorities"!

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Ebertfest 2008: "The real deal in brown paper wrapping"

As film exhibition in North America crowds itself ever more narrowly into predictable commercial fodder for an undemanding audience, we applaud those brave, free spirits who still hold faith with the unlimited potential of the cinema. - Roger Ebert


Here's the (somewhat belated) wrapup on the 10th Annual Roger Ebert's Film Festival.

Roger Ebert himself was "in exile," having broken his hip at the rehab center in Florida while trying to get himself in shape to attend. Having not yet regained the capacity for speech, Ebert has begun a blog/journal; here are his two Ebertfest entries: Ebertfest in Exile and Ebertfest in Exile II (or, why Ebert wants Joe vs. the Volcano, "a film that was a failure in every possible way except that I loved it" at his Festival). The best reader comment I saw posted was this one: "Will you PLEASE stay put? Or by 2013, the festival will be hosted by your brain in a vat."

And links to the Ebertfest 10 Photo Blog and Lisa Rosman's Festival Blog, The Broad View.

The festival traditionally opens Wednesday night with a 70-mm film, and this year was Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet.



For me, the most interesting discussions came from directors Ang Lee (following the screening of Hulk) and Paul Schrader (following the screening of Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters).
Lee indicated that Hulk was largely driven by issues between him and his father. See Lisa Rosman's post, Angsty Lee (and his Hulk). And while the military had no issues with Sam Elliott's portrayal of General Ross, there was a big issue with the fact that they didn't win! (As Lee said, what would be the point of the film if, in the end, Hulk was defeated?)

When a representative of Fuji, one of the primary financial backers of Paul Schrader's Mishima, told the (Japanese) man who had in turn promised their backing to Schrader, the man told the Fuji representative he would have no option but to "protect my family." Apparently this was a coded way of saying that, unable to deliver on his promise, he would be forced to kill himself. (Unspoken was the implication that this, in turn, would guarantee that no Japanese would do business with Fuji.) Fuji came through with the money, though they still officially deny any involvement. And the film has had virtually no distribution in Japan, all of which led Schrader to describe Mishima as "a film financed by no one, seen by no one." His view is that life doesn't have problems (which would imply solutions); rather, it has conundrums (to be explored). He also said that "Christianity, whatever you want to say about it, is a blood cult."

In her final post, Ms Rosman says her happiest surprise of this year's festival was Bill Forsyth's Housekeeping, and goes on to say about her flight from Champaign to NYC:
And on the final leg to NYC, Forsyth and I talked and talked and talked. Apparently hangovers aid my powers of comprehension. I’m glad. He is the essence of Ebertfest: The real deal in brown paper wrapping.

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Expelled (once and for all)

In this third (and, let's hope, last) post in this series, I'm including links to four articles in eSkeptic debunking claims made in Ben Stein's new film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.

Anticipating success with their feature film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, Producers Mark Mathis, Logan Craft and Walt Ruloff have already leaked a teaser trailer for the film’s sequel. Their “teach the controversy” slogan seemed to work well in getting the general public to believe that Intelligent Design is a viable alternative scientific theory to Evolution, so the team has moved on to promoting other theories that they feel are being suppressed by the scientific community. Sexpelled: No Intercourse Allowed tells of how Sex Theory has thrived unchallenged in the ivory towers of academia, as the explanation for how new babies are created. Proponents of Stork Theory claim that “Big Sex” has been suppressing their claim that babies are delivered by storks. Furthermore, Stork Theory proponents warn of the serious moral dangers posed by teaching children that sex has a function. They point out that evil dictators such as Hitler, Stalin and Mao all believed in Sex Theory, and they may have even had sex themselves.

There is also a late-breaking new development in the controversy, a new theory called Avian Transportation Theory.

Unlike the original Stork Theory, the modern, sophisticated “Avian Transportation Theory” (ATT) merely points out that there are gaps in the orthodox Sex Theory, and that current sonogram imaging is unreliable. Moreover ATT does not specify that babies are necessarily brought by storks but by “large birds unspecified” (although many individual ATT theorists PRIVATELY believe it is a stork).

WATCH the spoof

Here's a quick link to the YouTube version:
Note: Btw, I really do enjoy Ben Stein's Everybody's Business column in the the Sunday New York Times Business section.